Amortizing Sequential Experimental Design in Reasoning LLMs
Despite their extensive pretraining knowledge and strong reasoning capabilities, large language models (LLMs) struggle to adaptively gather information in experimental design tasks. We study how to…
- 用途
- 原典で確認
- 難易度の目安
- Easy
- 実装コストの目安
- High
概要
Despite their extensive pretraining knowledge and strong reasoning capabilities, large language models (LLMs) struggle to adaptively gather information in experimental design tasks. We study how to amortize sequential Bayesian experimental design (BED) into an LLM by explicitly training the reasoning that guides action selection using information-gain rewards. Our approach specifies the experimental generative model independently of the LLM's own beliefs, allowing us to optimize expected information gain under a model of our choosing. We investigate the design choices for amortization, including alternative generative-model constructions, reward estimation, hypothesis-space specification, multi-step objectives, and computational costs relative to training- and inference-time BED baselines. On Twenty Questions, the resulting policies improve information acquisition and task performance, outperform inference- and training-time BED baselines at substantially lower computational cost, and generalize to unseen categories. We further demonstrate positive transfer from Twenty Questions training to Medi-Q, a real-world clinical dialogue benchmark. These results suggest that information gathering can be learned as a generalizable reasoning skill in LLMs.
参考リンク
リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。
実装を始めるプロンプト
参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。
# 論文・記事 Amortizing Sequential Experimental Design in Reasoning LLMs # 概要 Despite their extensive pretraining knowledge and strong reasoning capabilities, large language models (LLMs) struggle to adaptively gather information in experimental design tasks. We study how to… # 原典 https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.20832 上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。