Reducing Logprob Without Causal Verification: Diagnosing SAE-Based PII Suppression in LLMs
SAE-based feature-level interventions to suppress PII leakage in LLMs are primarily evaluated by log-probability reduction. We show that this criterion cannot distinguish feature specific suppression…
- 用途
- 原典で確認
- 難易度の目安
- Hard
- 実装コストの目安
- High
概要
SAE-based feature-level interventions to suppress PII leakage in LLMs are primarily evaluated by log-probability reduction. We show that this criterion cannot distinguish feature specific suppression from a magnitude artifact: a direction-agnostic effect of sufficiently large activation perturbations. Across 36 (model, layer, PII type) cases, we compare selected SAE feature interventions with coherencematched random direction controls using logprob and rank-aware metrics. While 17 cases (47%) appear successful under logprob-only evaluation, only 1 case (2.8%) passes our multimetric framework. The rest reveal two failure modes: random directions outperform selected features, and feature selection collapse across PII types. These results indicate that existing evaluations cannot verify whether interventions target causal pathways of PII leakage. A 9,000 run causal mediation feasibility study corroborates this: the verifier separates candidates reliably, but correlation-selected candidates rarely pass it. We therefore propose a new research mission for NLP: causally grounded PII suppression through circuit-level localization and causal mediation analysis.
参考リンク
リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。
実装を始めるプロンプト
参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。
# 論文・記事 Reducing Logprob Without Causal Verification: Diagnosing SAE-Based PII Suppression in LLMs # 概要 SAE-based feature-level interventions to suppress PII leakage in LLMs are primarily evaluated by log-probability reduction. We show that this criterion cannot distinguish feature specific suppression… # 原典 https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.04782 上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。