Typological Feature Induction as a Benchmark for Inductive Metalinguistic Reasoning
Existing metalinguistic reasoning benchmarks require both inference of rules and their application, making failures hard to diagnose. We introduce typological feature induction (TFI) which targets…
- 用途
- 原典で確認
- 難易度の目安
- Hard
- 実装コストの目安
- High
概要
Existing metalinguistic reasoning benchmarks require both inference of rules and their application, making failures hard to diagnose. We introduce typological feature induction (TFI) which targets the former step. Given sentences in an unnamed language paired with translations in a known pivot language, models must predict a typological feature of the unnamed language. From Grambank and multi-parallel corpora, we automatically build evaluation questions over 195 languages. We find that LLMs identify 59--80% of these languages from only 16 sentence pairs; and misaligning the translations barely affects their accuracy, suggesting reliance on prior knowledge of the language. Enciphering text to prevent recognition increases the corpus' utility, but mainly for features where target and pivot languages agree. On languages which models cannot identify, neither open model outperforms a majority-value baseline. Since induction from raw text aligns with field linguists' use-case, this work indicates the models tested are not yet ready for this role. TFI offers a scalable path to track progress in this direction.
参考リンク
リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。
実装を始めるプロンプト
参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。
# 論文・記事 Typological Feature Induction as a Benchmark for Inductive Metalinguistic Reasoning # 概要 Existing metalinguistic reasoning benchmarks require both inference of rules and their application, making failures hard to diagnose. We introduce typological feature induction (TFI) which targets… # 原典 https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.04421 上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。