LLMs Depend on Specialist Tools for Out-of-Distribution Generalization in MS/MS Structural Elucidation
A frontier language model was recently reported to solve 1D NMR structural elucidation without tools. We ask whether this capability transfers to tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) in the de novo…
- 用途
- 原典で確認
- 難易度の目安
- Hard
- 実装コストの目安
- High
概要
A frontier language model was recently reported to solve 1D NMR structural elucidation without tools. We ask whether this capability transfers to tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) in the de novo setting, where the model must propose a structure directly from the spectrum without a candidate list or reference library. To separate reasoning from recall, we build a 100-analyte benchmark from MassSpecGym, split by each analyte's textual footprint into in-distribution (well documented in literature) and out-of-distribution (essentially undocumented) arms. We hold the model, harness, and output format fixed and vary only the LLM's access to domain-specific tools. Without tools, a frontier LLM reaches 52% Top-1 accuracy in-distribution but only 2% out-of-distribution. Only access to de novo structure generators improves out-of-distribution accuracy, raising it to as much as 38% Top-1, and the resulting agent outperforms the standalone de novo models both in and out of distribution. These results suggest that LLMs are not effective at de novo MS/MS structural elucidation on their own, and that further gains depend on the specialist tools available to the agent rather than on the LLM itself.
参考リンク
リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。
実装を始めるプロンプト
参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。
# 論文・記事 LLMs Depend on Specialist Tools for Out-of-Distribution Generalization in MS/MS Structural Elucidation # 概要 A frontier language model was recently reported to solve 1D NMR structural elucidation without tools. We ask whether this capability transfers to tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) in the de novo… # 原典 https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.03308 上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。