nlparxiv

What Do LLM Judges Actually Verify? Matched Controls and Record Gaps for Document Currency

LLM judges often check, against an amendment record, whether the documents an answer cites are still in force. Such records are rarely complete.

Unnati Shah / Samruddhi Kakade / Aum Patel

用途
原典で確認
難易度の目安
Hard
実装コストの目安
High

概要

LLM judges often check, against an amendment record, whether the documents an answer cites are still in force. Such records are rarely complete. From a table of replacements, our test generates matched answers citing a replaced document, its successor, the replaced document before its replacement, and an older document that a newer one updated without replacing; it removes links from the record and scores each finding by its stated reason. On 48 replacements from the IETF RFC index, judges given a correct record caught nearly every replaced citation, as a lookup would. On the 24 faults whose link we removed, every judge caught more from the texts alone than with the record: Gemini 3.1 Pro 23/24 against 1/24, GPT-5.5 23/24 against 9/24, Claude Opus 4.5 17/24 against 9/24 and Gemma 4 26B 13/24 against 0/24. The drop recurred on a second draw of removed links. Most misses carried no finding; in an exploratory run with a conflict code, only Gemini used it often. Rewording the gap as "no replacement recorded" did not help; presenting the record as an unverified note, or warning that it was incomplete, restored most lost catches for Gemini, GPT-5.5 and Claude (significant after correction for the first two) but at most 5 of 13 for Gemma; where catches returned, so did false alarms on updates. With both texts, judges mostly told replacements from updates; every update flagged had a near-identical title. A descriptive case study on Indian rooftop-solar rules is appended; we release the harness.

参考リンク

リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。

実装を始めるプロンプト

参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。

# 論文・記事
What Do LLM Judges Actually Verify? Matched Controls and Record Gaps for Document Currency

# 概要
LLM judges often check, against an amendment record, whether the documents an answer cites are still in force. Such records are rarely complete.

# 原典
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01311

上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。

関連する記事