Capability-Grounded Agentic Planning
LLM agents serve natural-language requests through tools, data sources, and other agents, and even simple requests often need several interdependent calls. Typically, the LLM picks these calls by…
- 用途
- 原典で確認
- 難易度の目安
- Hard
- 実装コストの目安
- High
概要
LLM agents serve natural-language requests through tools, data sources, and other agents, and even simple requests often need several interdependent calls. Typically, the LLM picks these calls by trial and error, with no guarantee of an executable plan. We present Capability-Grounded Agentic Planning (CGAP), which instead reasons about what a request requires and what tools provide. CGAP compiles the tool catalog deterministically into a PDDL model, uses an LLM to turn the request into goals, and solves the model with a classical planner. Since tool outputs are unknown in advance, the model is abstract, tracking which inputs are available, not their values. During execution, an LLM adds entity-specific calls that abstract plans omit, and deterministic checks reject any that break the plan. Every argument is drawn from a cited source, such as a conversation span or an earlier tool response, and each requested result counts as delivered only after an LLM verifier checks it against the request. With three LLMs on ToolSandbox, ComplexFuncBench, BFCL multi-turn, and $τ^2$-bench retail, CGAP outperforms a standard tool-calling agent by up to 28.9 points.
参考リンク
リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。
実装を始めるプロンプト
参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。
# 論文・記事 Capability-Grounded Agentic Planning # 概要 LLM agents serve natural-language requests through tools, data sources, and other agents, and even simple requests often need several interdependent calls. Typically, the LLM picks these calls by… # 原典 https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41040 上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。