nlparxiv

Look at Where You Think: Localization-Head Alignment for Fine-Grained Perception in Thinking VLMs

Thinking vision-language models reason for thousands of tokens, yet still miss small details in high-resolution images. Zooming methods pay for extra inference passes, and outcome rewards never tell…

Yuan Wang / Wei Wu / Hongning Wang

用途
原典で確認
難易度の目安
Hard
実装コストの目安
High

概要

Thinking vision-language models reason for thousands of tokens, yet still miss small details in high-resolution images. Zooming methods pay for extra inference passes, and outcome rewards never tell the model where to look at. In Qwen3.5-4B, we find that the bottleneck is selection, not seeing: a few attention heads, which we call localization heads, pick the evidence out of thousands of visual tokens; ablating four of them costs 13.2 points more than ablating four random heads, and their focus fades as the reasoning grows. We therefore propose Localization-Head Alignment (LHA), which makes attention a training signal: whenever the reasoning states a visual fact, these heads learn to look at the focal region rather than the background, as an auxiliary loss in both SFT and RL training. On benchmarks of V*, HR-Bench 4K and TreeBench, LHA lifts Qwen3.5-4B from 74.1% to 76.6% accuracy, the best single-pass 4B result we evaluate, ahead of multi-pass zooming and released 7B models. Alignment alone adds 1.8 points over otherwise identical training while shortening reasoning by 20%, and the gains carry over to Qwen2.5-VL-3B.

参考リンク

リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。

実装を始めるプロンプト

参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。

# 論文・記事
Look at Where You Think: Localization-Head Alignment for Fine-Grained Perception in Thinking VLMs

# 概要
Thinking vision-language models reason for thousands of tokens, yet still miss small details in high-resolution images. Zooming methods pay for extra inference passes, and outcome rewards never tell…

# 原典
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.39649

上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。

関連する記事

arxiv実装リンクあり

Where Do Vision Language Models Fail at 3D Reasoning?

Vision-language models can get individual judgments right while struggling to recover and consistently use the exact properties of a 3D object. To characterize this gap, we introduce BedBench, a…

nlp