nlparxiv

Interventional Training Reduces Causal Bypass in In-Context Introspection

Introspection, the ability of a system to access and reason about its internal signals, is crucial for language model (LM) self-consistency and scalable interpretability. Prior work argues that LMs…

Zilu Tang / Jongin Kim / Kerem Sahin / David Atkinson / Aaron Mueller

用途
原典で確認
難易度の目安
Hard
実装コストの目安
High

概要

Introspection, the ability of a system to access and reason about its internal signals, is crucial for language model (LM) self-consistency and scalable interpretability. Prior work argues that LMs possess introspective capabilities, and that training (SFT) could enhance such behavior. However, most setups leave open the possibility of "causal bypass," in which the self-report relies on signals that are correlated with the self-report's subject, while being causally unrelated to it. Although high-level concepts are difficult to intervene on, lower-level signals (such as a single neuron activation) allow precise interventions. Understanding such signals can serve as a minimal prerequisite before understanding more complex introspection. In this study, we train hundreds of introspectors across three low-level signal types and eight LMs. We find that straightforward SFT training leads to causal bypass, and propose interventional training, an alternative where we train the model to report on counterfactually perturbed values. This method enables more accurate introspection of endogenous $\textit{and}$ injected signals, particularly in out-of-distribution (OOD) data. The mechanism generalizes across token positions and scales with more data. Our results demonstrate that while causally grounded introspection is possible, it is not guaranteed -- emphasizing the need to train on mechanisms, rather than behaviors alone.

参考リンク

リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。

実装を始めるプロンプト

参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。

# 論文・記事
Interventional Training Reduces Causal Bypass in In-Context Introspection

# 概要
Introspection, the ability of a system to access and reason about its internal signals, is crucial for language model (LM) self-consistency and scalable interpretability. Prior work argues that LMs…

# 原典
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38911

上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。

関連する記事

arxiv実装リンクあり

Where Do Vision Language Models Fail at 3D Reasoning?

Vision-language models can get individual judgments right while struggling to recover and consistently use the exact properties of a 3D object. To characterize this gap, we introduce BedBench, a…

nlp