nlparxiv

Human-Residual Steering: Aligning Frozen LLM Judges with Human Judgment Distributions

Large language models (LLMs) are widely used as automated judges, yet most alignment methods target aggregated human judgments and overlook variation among individual annotators. Existing approaches…

Chen Lyu / Phong Do / Gabriele Pergola

用途
原典で確認
難易度の目安
Hard
実装コストの目安
High

概要

Large language models (LLMs) are widely used as automated judges, yet most alignment methods target aggregated human judgments and overlook variation among individual annotators. Existing approaches to matching the full distribution of human ratings mainly rely on output-level calibration or parameter fine-tuning. We propose Human-Residual Steering (HRS), to our knowledge the first method to align frozen LLM judges with human judgment distributions through learned hidden-state interventions. An oracle analysis shows that low-rank corrections at a single layer remove most of the discrepancy between judge and human distributions. HRS learns to predict such corrections from the judge's hidden representation and rating logits, training on individual annotations with proper scoring rules for ordinal and nominal judgments and optimising through the frozen downstream layers. Across 14 benchmarks and four judges from three model families, HRS outperforms all evaluated frozen-weight baselines. With Qwen2.5-7B, it achieves the lowest Jensen-Shannon distance on 13 of 14 benchmarks, reducing the mean from 0.565 to 0.352 versus 0.377 for the strongest calibrator. HRS also raises mean Spearman correlation with aggregate human scores from 0.449 to 0.579, improves population-level estimation under limited annotation budgets, and trains about 88 times fewer parameters than distributional fine-tuning at a modest cost in alignment.

参考リンク

リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。

実装を始めるプロンプト

参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。

# 論文・記事
Human-Residual Steering: Aligning Frozen LLM Judges with Human Judgment Distributions

# 概要
Large language models (LLMs) are widely used as automated judges, yet most alignment methods target aggregated human judgments and overlook variation among individual annotators. Existing approaches…

# 原典
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37868

上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。

関連する記事