nlparxiv

Invisibilization as a Source of Probability Bias in Language Models

Language models are aligned to avoid using protected attributes such as race, ethnicity, and gender to inform their responses. Therefore, they increasingly refuse or hedge when such attributes appear…

Christian Arnold / Ernesto Calvo / Guadalupe Gonzalez / Sebastián Vallejo Vera / Tiago Ventura

用途
原典で確認
難易度の目安
Hard
実装コストの目安
High

概要

Language models are aligned to avoid using protected attributes such as race, ethnicity, and gender to inform their responses. Therefore, they increasingly refuse or hedge when such attributes appear in a prompt. However, if a system must decide how much to learn from what people tell it, it is costly to refuse valuable information because of its source. In this article, we measure the cost of declining information in a two-urn game with an exact Bayesian answer. We present leading LLM models from two developers (OpenAI and Anthropic) with a prompt that requires them to decide how far to trust an unverifiable report from a participant whose description we randomize across ten configurations (6,600 sessions). We show that leading models often decline to assess the reporter, treating information as worthless at rates set by the description rather than by the evidence. At its widest, models decline a Black-described reporter 46% of the time and a white-described reporter 9%; yet, when they do assess the information, the Black-described reporter receives slightly more trust. The bias is invisible to audits that compare average trust or look only at assessed cases. It grows with reasoning effort, follows words rather than categories (models invoke race for "Black" but not for its Spanish translation negro, and never for "Indigenous"), and worsens under warning instructions a practitioner would try first. We also present a scoring option that reduces the refusal rate bias. When a model's trust is scored against revealed truth over repeated rounds, it credits identical records equally. In four of five configurations from Anthropic and OpenAI, the racial gap in trust falls below 0.02 by the last rounds.

参考リンク

リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。

実装を始めるプロンプト

参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。

# 論文・記事
Invisibilization as a Source of Probability Bias in Language Models

# 概要
Language models are aligned to avoid using protected attributes such as race, ethnicity, and gender to inform their responses. Therefore, they increasingly refuse or hedge when such attributes appear…

# 原典
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30785

上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。

関連する記事