From Single-Actor Environments to Multi-Actor Event Worlds: Can LLMs Be Event World Models?

概要

World models help agents assess the consequences of their actions before acting. Many real systems, however, involve multiple actors who make their own decisions, can evolve even when the agent takes no action, and are only partially observed through event logs. We formalize these systems as event worlds and ask whether large language models can predict future observations from the log and the agent's proposed actions. We build complementary benchmarks from human Diplomacy games and real Polymarket trades. Our hierarchical framework compares prediction with and without other actors' actions, then tests multi-step rollouts, predictions for actions never taken, and usefulness to agents. Fine-tuning and more data improve prediction when all actors' recorded actions are given. With only the agent's action, models struggle when other actors strongly affect the outcome, and larger models and longer histories help little. This gap also limits multi-step prediction and agent decisions, with models overestimating plan success. Yet imagined experience and initialization from world models can still improve policy learning. Anticipating other actors' actions remains a central challenge for event world modeling.

参考リンク

• Paper ↗

リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。

実装を始めるプロンプト

参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。

# 論文・記事
From Single-Actor Environments to Multi-Actor Event Worlds: Can LLMs Be Event World Models?

# 概要
World models help agents assess the consequences of their actions before acting. Many real systems, however, involve multiple actors who make their own decisions, can evolve even when the agent takes…

# 原典
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30488

上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。