nlparxiv

Unit-level aggregation breaks coverage in causal foundation models

Causal foundation models (CFMs) show promising results for treatment-effect estimation, with unit-level estimates that are competitive on standard benchmarks. Many causal analyses, however, inform…

Gabe Schulman / Lucius E. J. Bynum / Yoav Wald

用途
原典で確認
難易度の目安
Hard
実装コストの目安
Low

概要

Causal foundation models (CFMs) show promising results for treatment-effect estimation, with unit-level estimates that are competitive on standard benchmarks. Many causal analyses, however, inform decisions through effects averaged over groups of units, such as the full sample, the treated units, or a subgroup, and for such decisions a CFM is useful only if its credible intervals are calibrated. We examine these intervals and find that their coverage degrades, both in simple synthetic settings and on standard benchmarks. On ACIC 2016, for example, temperature-calibrated 95% intervals from CausalPFN fall below nominal coverage beyond groups of 30 out of 4802 units, and intervals for the full-sample average contain the true value in only 20% of datasets. We trace this problem to how these models are trained and how their intervals are formed. They output a predictive distribution for one unit at a time and, at inference time, combine the unit-level variances as if the errors on different units were independent. We show formally that posterior uncertainty over the data-generating process makes these errors correlated. As a result, the combined variance is too small by a factor that grows with the size of the group. Empirically, this factor predicts where coverage fails and by how much. We then show that two neural process models, which make joint predictions for a group of units, account for this correlation and substantially improve coverage on synthetic tasks and, as heads on a frozen CausalPFN, on all six benchmarks.

参考リンク

リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。

実装を始めるプロンプト

参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。

# 論文・記事
Unit-level aggregation breaks coverage in causal foundation models

# 概要
Causal foundation models (CFMs) show promising results for treatment-effect estimation, with unit-level estimates that are competitive on standard benchmarks. Many causal analyses, however, inform…

# 原典
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22770

上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。

関連する記事

arxiv実装リンクあり

SCARL: Sequence Confidence-Aligned Reinforcement Learning

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) improves language-model reasoning by scoring sampled responses with a rule-based verifier and reinforcing those that pass. Where a classifier's…

nlp