Who Takes the Lead? Model Ability and Task-Conditioned Collaboration with Humans
As language-model agents grow more capable, they can carry more of a task without asking anyone for help. Falling reliance on a human partner is easy to read as a failure of collaboration when it may…
- 用途
- 原典で確認
- 難易度の目安
- Easy
- 実装コストの目安
- Medium
概要
As language-model agents grow more capable, they can carry more of a task without asking anyone for help. Falling reliance on a human partner is easy to read as a failure of collaboration when it may instead be a correct division of labor, and the rate of human involvement alone cannot tell the two apart. We study this systematically by placing an agent and a person under a shared objective while varying who holds the advantage: the human has a clear advantage, neither does, or the agent does. To obtain this control, we introduce a shared-control maze, in which an agent-controlled and a human-controlled avatar share the objective of reaching a common target in as few team turns as possible. The agent allocates each team turn between acting itself and handing the move to the person, and initial placement sets the human's shortest-path advantage while the task is otherwise unchanged. We evaluate GPT~5.6~Sol, Command~A+, Qwen~3.8~27B, and Command~R, first measuring solo capability with a single avatar and full-map observability, then running co-play with human participants across the three advantage conditions. Across the four models, stronger solo performance is associated with selective, route-conditioned human involvement: the models that solve the maze reliably on their own act for themselves almost without exception when the human holds no advantage, and involve the human on roughly 80% of initial decisions when the human route is shorter. Command R, the model with substantially weaker solo performance, shows no such selectivity.
参考リンク
リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。
実装を始めるプロンプト
参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。
# 論文・記事 Who Takes the Lead? Model Ability and Task-Conditioned Collaboration with Humans # 概要 As language-model agents grow more capable, they can carry more of a task without asking anyone for help. Falling reliance on a human partner is easy to read as a failure of collaboration when it may… # 原典 https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27148 上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。