Rethinking Self-Repair in Code-as-Policy Agents: What Drives Retry Success?
Code-as-policy agents often use execution feedback to retry failed programs. Additional sampling and task guidance can also improve success, leaving the contribution of failure-specific feedback…
- 用途
- 原典で確認
- 難易度の目安
- Hard
- 実装コストの目安
- Medium
概要
Code-as-policy agents often use execution feedback to retry failed programs. Additional sampling and task guidance can also improve success, leaving the contribution of failure-specific feedback unclear. We study this question in simulated robot manipulation. A fixed lookup selects feedback templates using failure labels and the API variant. A frozen code model generates a fresh program after each scene reset. On the same 252 initial failures, Qwen2.5-Coder-7B recovers 85.3% within five retries, compared with 68.3% for resampling with the same retry cap. The advantage persists under fixed total-token budgets. Feedback from other episodes and fixed task guidance yield similar recovery point estimates, with no detected benefit from matching the coarse failure label. In a separate study, a fixed guided prompt used from the first attempt achieves an observed overall success rate similar to that of template-based feedback. Template-based feedback also lowers recovery on a nut-insertion task requiring a rim grasp, consistent with an incompatible center-grasp instruction. Evaluations of robot self-repair should include resampling, mismatched feedback, and concise, task-compatible static guidance as baselines.
参考リンク
リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。
実装を始めるプロンプト
参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。
# 論文・記事 Rethinking Self-Repair in Code-as-Policy Agents: What Drives Retry Success? # 概要 Code-as-policy agents often use execution feedback to retry failed programs. Additional sampling and task guidance can also improve success, leaving the contribution of failure-specific feedback… # 原典 https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06863 上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。