Tight bounds for fractional and randomized truthful scheduling
We resolve one of the longest-standing open problems in algorithmic mechanism design by showing that randomization cannot yield a sublinear approximation for truthful scheduling on unrelated…
- 用途
- 原典で確認
- 難易度の目安
- Hard
- 実装コストの目安
- Medium
概要
We resolve one of the longest-standing open problems in algorithmic mechanism design by showing that randomization cannot yield a sublinear approximation for truthful scheduling on unrelated machines, even when truthfulness is required only in expectation. Our main technical result concerns fractional scheduling, where tasks may be split among machines. We prove that every deterministic truthful fractional mechanism on $n$ unrelated machines has worst-case approximation ratio at least $(n+1)/2$, even against the optimal integral makespan. This matches the known upper bound exactly and settles the optimal approximation ratio of truthful fractional scheduling. Since the expected allocations and payments of a truthful-in-expectation mechanism define a truthful fractional mechanism, the same lower bound applies to all truthful-in-expectation mechanisms and, in particular, to all universally truthful mechanisms. On the positive side, we give a universally truthful mechanism with approximation ratio $n/2+o(n)$. Together, these results establish the optimal leading constant $1/2$ for randomized truthful scheduling. Thus, randomization improves on the optimal deterministic approximation ratio by an asymptotic factor of two, and no more.
参考リンク
リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。
実装を始めるプロンプト
参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。
# 論文・記事 Tight bounds for fractional and randomized truthful scheduling # 概要 We resolve one of the longest-standing open problems in algorithmic mechanism design by showing that randomization cannot yield a sublinear approximation for truthful scheduling on unrelated… # 原典 https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06642 上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。