When Are Two SAE Latents the Same Feature?

概要

Comparing sparse autoencoders (SAEs) requires connecting feature correspondence, differences between whole dictionaries, and uncertainty from finite evaluation data. We develop a framework that connects these tasks through an energy-weighted optimal-transport plan under a specified similarity geometry. The same plan defines a dictionary-level discrepancy, decomposes it into latent contributions, and quantifies how each latent's mass is distributed across counterparts. We characterize relationships between decoder, activation, and first-order causal similarities; idealized models clarify the interpretation of splitting and absorption. For fixed trained SAEs, we derive joint asymptotic inference for transport costs and fractions, accounting for activation similarities and both energy marginals estimated from the same documents. A joint document bootstrap gives asymptotically valid simultaneous confidence bands. Experiments across four language models locate cross-seed discrepancy and separate context-dependent changes.

参考リンク

• Paper ↗

リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。

実装を始めるプロンプト

参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。

# 論文・記事
When Are Two SAE Latents the Same Feature?

# 概要
Comparing sparse autoencoders (SAEs) requires connecting feature correspondence, differences between whole dictionaries, and uncertainty from finite evaluation data. We develop a framework that…

# 原典
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05655

上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。