reinforcement-learningarxiv

Found by Search, Broken by a Shortcut: Transfer and Tampering of Searched Intrinsic Rewards

Can a search over innate drives find intrinsic rewards that help a reinforcement-learning agent learn, transfer to a task it never saw, and resist an exploit that was absent during the search? Each…

Chase J. Metoyer

用途
原典で確認
難易度の目安
Hard
実装コストの目安
High

概要

Can a search over innate drives find intrinsic rewards that help a reinforcement-learning agent learn, transfer to a task it never saw, and resist an exploit that was absent during the search? Each candidate reward combines four generic events (a new view, a pickup, a drop and a toggle), each with a weight, a relief and a refill rate. We ran three pre-registered stages; the search protocol was locked in a public, timestamped commit before any search result existed. CMA-ES and an equal-budget random search used 1,560 PPO training runs, and the final evaluation and tamper test used 340. On the held-out task, KeyCorridorS3R2, the CMA-ES-selected reward (E) beat task-only PPO, episodic novelty and the random-search-selected reward (R) in all 3 registered comparisons, all of them meaningful by the registered size rule. Among these generic rewards E transferred best; the earlier paper's satiation reward, which on this task is given hand-wired key and locked-door events, did better (20 of 20 seeds solved against 4 of 20; descriptive). On UnlockPickup, where that reward uses generic events, E's mean area exceeded it by 0.276 (descriptive). On the training tasks there was no registered difference between E and R: both E-over-R tests missed. A free reset action, absent during the search, collapsed E's learning on DoorKey-8x8 (mean area 0.829 without it, 0.136 with it; registered) to below task-only PPO (descriptive). The searched drives helped on every task tested, but a reward given task-specific events did better on the held-out task, and selection gave E no protection against an exploit absent from the search.

参考リンク

リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。

実装を始めるプロンプト

参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。

# 論文・記事
Found by Search, Broken by a Shortcut: Transfer and Tampering of Searched Intrinsic Rewards

# 概要
Can a search over innate drives find intrinsic rewards that help a reinforcement-learning agent learn, transfer to a task it never saw, and resist an exploit that was absent during the search? Each…

# 原典
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.04838

上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。

関連する記事

github実装リンクあり

qlib — Qlib is an AI-oriented Quant investment platform that aims to use AI tech to empower Quant Research, from exploring ideas to implementing productions. Qlib supports diverse ML modeling paradigms, including supervised learning, market dynamics modeling, and RL, and is now equipped with https://github.com/microsoft/RD-Agent to automate R&D process.

クエンティング投資プラットフォームを実現するためにAI技術を活用します。

クエンティング投資プラットフォーム