deep-learningarxiv

What Does It Mean to Remove an Edge? Intervention-Aware Fidelity for Graph Neural Network Explanations

Graph neural network explanations are often evaluated via deletion fidelity, i.e., by deleting their top-ranked edges and measuring the resulting change in model output. Yet, in a message-passing…

Rocco Mattia Di Mauro / Marco Grassia / Giuseppe Mangioni

用途
原典で確認
難易度の目安
Hard
実装コストの目安
Medium

概要

Graph neural network explanations are often evaluated via deletion fidelity, i.e., by deleting their top-ranked edges and measuring the resulting change in model output. Yet, in a message-passing GNN, "deleting an edge" does not specify a unique intervention. Structural deletion removes the edge from the graph and recomputes quantities such as degree normalization and attention, whereas message suppression leaves this structural context intact while blocking the message carried by the edge. The meaning of deletion fidelity therefore depends on what the intervention targets in the model computation. We formalize this distinction and derive sufficient conditions for exact equivalence. The two interventions coincide for additive message passing with edge-set-independent coefficients, but can diverge when aggregation depends on the presence of zero messages or when removing an edge changes the coefficients applied to surviving messages. We then construct intervention-specific edge attributions and evaluate each resulting ranking under both interventions, testing whether their relative fidelity changes with the evaluation intervention. Across nine datasets and a panel of GIN, GCN, and GATv2 models at depths 2--5, all nine GIN controls satisfy the equivalence predicted by the theory. On the target logit, the relative fidelity of the two rankings depends on the evaluation intervention in 10 of 11 reportable GCN and GATv2 cells, and in nine of them each ranking has the larger deletion area under the intervention it was built with. Deletion fidelity is thus not a property of an edge ranking alone. Evaluation protocols should explicitly report the intervention, output functional, target, and perturbation unit, and test alternative intervention semantics when the scientific question does not uniquely determine one.

参考リンク

リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。

実装を始めるプロンプト

参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。

# 論文・記事
What Does It Mean to Remove an Edge? Intervention-Aware Fidelity for Graph Neural Network Explanations

# 概要
Graph neural network explanations are often evaluated via deletion fidelity, i.e., by deleting their top-ranked edges and measuring the resulting change in model output. Yet, in a message-passing…

# 原典
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.04751

上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。

関連する記事

arxiv実装リンクあり

RGDM: Robust Graph Diffusion Model

Diffusion models represent a powerful class of generative models known for their solid theoretical foundations and remarkable performance across diverse tasks and domains. Existing node level…

deep-learning
arxiv実装リンクあり

SO(3)-Equivariant Learning on CAD Boundary Representations

Learning on boundary representations (B-reps) requires robustness to the pose of a part, since CAD models are not stored in a canonical orientation. Existing B-rep networks either operate on…

deep-learning