deep-learningarxiv

The SIMPLE Law for Energy Cost of LLM Inference

Generative AI is billed per token, yet tokens are not equally expensive. Each token enters the KV-cache and raises the cost of those that follow, so energy grows non-linearly along a sequence whose…

Hiari Pizzini Cavagna / Andrea Proia / Daniele Cesarini / Zeynep Kiziltan / Andrea Bartolini

用途
原典で確認
難易度の目安
Hard
実装コストの目安
High

概要

Generative AI is billed per token, yet tokens are not equally expensive. Each token enters the KV-cache and raises the cost of those that follow, so energy grows non-linearly along a sequence whose tokens look identical. No analytical model states what a token costs, and the most accurate SOTA model is a fit, not a law: it absorbs architecture into fitted coefficients, requiring per-LLM fitting. We derive closed-form expressions of the computational and memory-access complexity of LLM inference in terms of architectural hyperparameters, covering MHA and GQA, and compare a family of analytical models of increasing granularity. From these, we obtain the SIMPLE Inference Model to Predict LLMs Energy (SIMPLE), a four-parameter law that separates prefill from decode, and decode into KV-cache cost and next-token computation. Over traces of 13 dense LLMs from six families on NVIDIA H100 GPUs, it attains R2 = 0.969 and 11.97% MAPE, 3.1-3.5x below the SOTA, without per-LLM calibration. The SIMPLE law explains as well as predicts: prefill energy grows quadratically with the hidden dimension, so larger LLMs suffer most from long inputs; and more aggressive GQA KV grouping reduces the per-token energy by up to 3x relative to standard MHA. Increasing the reasoning token budget pushes output length beyond the analytically derived energy minimum, driving super-linear energy growth; although accuracy grows with the budget, energy grows faster, so Intelligence per Joule peaks at an intermediate budget and falls by up to 3.14x across a 4.0x reasoning-budget range. Agentic serving raises energy per request by 13.0x relative to non-agentic ones, driven by the growth of both the prefill and the KV-cache terms with input length; while prefix caching removes most of the prefill cost (-93%), the KV-cache term is unaffected, so even a cached agentic request costs 4.8x more.

参考リンク

リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。

実装を始めるプロンプト

参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。

# 論文・記事
The SIMPLE Law for Energy Cost of LLM Inference

# 概要
Generative AI is billed per token, yet tokens are not equally expensive. Each token enters the KV-cache and raises the cost of those that follow, so energy grows non-linearly along a sequence whose…

# 原典
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.03330

上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。

関連する記事

github実装リンクあり

FastGen — NVIDIA FastGen: Fast Generation from Diffusion Models

この論文では、ディフュージョンモデルの高速化を目的としたNVIDIA FastGenについて説明しています。FastGenは、ディフュージョンモデルから高速に生成することが可能です。

ディフュージョンモデルの高速化