KEEPER: Learning Control-Sufficient Textual Memory for Long-Horizon LLM Agents
Recursive textual memory can carry earlier errors into later updates, yet task performance alone does not establish memory reliability. We define self-consistency bias as the persistence of incorrect…
- 用途
- 原典で確認
- 難易度の目安
- Hard
- 実装コストの目安
- High
概要
Recursive textual memory can carry earlier errors into later updates, yet task performance alone does not establish memory reliability. We define self-consistency bias as the persistence of incorrect claims already present in the incoming memory. We present KEEPER, a comparative analysis of four auxiliary objectives along information-content and update-sensitivity axes within a shared recursive interface, examining how supervision targets relate to agent performance. Among evaluated conditions, reward-related prediction achieve the highest task performance before and after offline reinforcement learning, outperforming joint supervision. A claim-level analysis of one baseline trajectory documents error persistence despite corrective observations. Together, these analyses motivate evaluating error persistence and valid-information retention alongside task outcomes.
参考リンク
リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。
実装を始めるプロンプト
参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。
# 論文・記事 KEEPER: Learning Control-Sufficient Textual Memory for Long-Horizon LLM Agents # 概要 Recursive textual memory can carry earlier errors into later updates, yet task performance alone does not establish memory reliability. We define self-consistency bias as the persistence of incorrect… # 原典 https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482 上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。