How Much Should a VLA Trust Its Reasoning? Step-Level Guidance as a Measured Action-Value Function
Reasoning vision-language-action (VLA) policies write a reasoning trace and then decode the action from it. A wrong trace yields a wrong action, and even a correct-looking trace can mislead the plan.
- 用途
- 原典で確認
- 難易度の目安
- Hard
- 実装コストの目安
- High
概要
Reasoning vision-language-action (VLA) policies write a reasoning trace and then decode the action from it. A wrong trace yields a wrong action, and even a correct-looking trace can mislead the plan. Existing remedies ask whether the reasoning is right. We ask how strongly it should steer. CoC-CFG applies classifier-free guidance between the policy's context and the same context without the reasoning span. One weight per Euler step attenuates or amplifies the reasoning, and w=1 recovers the original policy. We treat the choice of this weight as a Markov decision process whose action values are measured, not bootstrapped. With the expert frozen and the noise fixed, applying a weight for one step and finishing the plan under the current controller returns that weight's value exactly. Q-adaptive guidance fits these values with small critics and improves the controller conservatively. In the Alpasim driving simulator it outperforms every fixed weight and online RL (SAC, GRPO) in open loop, and in closed loop it passes 262 of 300 scenes, against 252 for the original policy. On held-out frames of the Waymo end-to-end driving benchmark, its first three stages outperform every fixed weight, four adaptive-guidance methods, SAC and GRPO. On the hidden test set, a frozen Alpamayo 1.5 with rule-based camera and vehicle conversions and Q-adaptive guidance sets a new state of the art among published methods: 8.135159 rater feedback score, against 8.079 for the best published method.
参考リンク
リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。
実装を始めるプロンプト
参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。
# 論文・記事 How Much Should a VLA Trust Its Reasoning? Step-Level Guidance as a Measured Action-Value Function # 概要 Reasoning vision-language-action (VLA) policies write a reasoning trace and then decode the action from it. A wrong trace yields a wrong action, and even a correct-looking trace can mislead the plan. # 原典 https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40002 上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。