VLTest: Finding Joint Image-Text Failures in Vision-Language Models
Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly embedded in software systems. Testing them raises two problems.
- 用途
- 原典で確認
- 難易度の目安
- Hard
- 実装コストの目安
- High
概要
Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly embedded in software systems. Testing them raises two problems. Mutating either input can change the expected answer, so an output change is not by itself a failure. Some failures appear only when both inputs are mutated; attributing them to the combination requires testing each mutation alone. We present VLTest, a black-box VLM testing approach. It generates image variants by editing VQGAN latent codes and text variants with a rewrite-expand-prune pipeline, filters variants likely to change the expected answer, and tests each variant alone before testing combinations, so every joint failure has four matched cells. A VLM judge confirms a failure only after checking that the input keeps the expected answer. On three tasks with eight VLMs, including two commercial API models, the oracle confirms 81.7% of the candidates, with 88.8% to 94.6% precision against human labels, and four-cell confirmation rejects 22.5% of joint candidates. Under the same budget, VLTest's generators find 1.8 to 2.5 times as many confirmed failures as SINVAD and TextFooler, and its joint tests find 91 to 197 attributed joint failures per 1,000 joint calls, 1.3 times as many as the same pairing applied to the baselines' variants.
参考リンク
リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。
実装を始めるプロンプト
参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。
# 論文・記事 VLTest: Finding Joint Image-Text Failures in Vision-Language Models # 概要 Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly embedded in software systems. Testing them raises two problems. # 原典 https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30794 上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。