Where Has the Foreign Signal Gone?

概要

We compare the relation between sentiment noise in the Twitter feed and losses for stocks of domestic and foreign firms. The mean quarterly domestic-foreign difference in the slope of next-quarter losses on measured noise is -1.40 (Newey-West t = -2.99). This slope is negative for 78 and 48 percent of the quarters for domestic and foreign stocks, respectively (block-bootstrap p = 0.016). Thus, this relationship is temporally more stable for domestic stocks. We use a noisy rational expectations model to explain these patterns through the composition of the contributor pool. The feeds for stocks of foreign firms have higher repeat-author concentration and a larger model-implied nonfundamental component than those for domestic firms. We interpret these differences through the producer-knowledge mismatch hypothesis. For foreign firms, the English-language contributor pool underrepresents the home-market investors who tend to possess informational advantages about them. Thus, the foreign signal is not gone but diluted.

参考リンク

• Paper ↗

リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。

実装を始めるプロンプト

参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。

# 論文・記事
Where Has the Foreign Signal Gone?

# 概要
We compare the relation between sentiment noise in the Twitter feed and losses for stocks of domestic and foreign firms. The mean quarterly domestic-foreign difference in the slope of next-quarter…

# 原典
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28175

上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。