deep-learningarxiv

Which Model for Which Role? Cost-Efficient Pareto Recommendation for LLM Agentic Workflows

LLM agentic workflows increasingly employ different models for specialized roles. Users may prefer different trade-offs between task quality and deployment cost, sometimes also considering latency.

Qian Xie / Wenyue Hua / Yueli He / Sripad Karne / Armaan Agrawal

用途
原典で確認
難易度の目安
Hard
実装コストの目安
High

概要

LLM agentic workflows increasingly employ different models for specialized roles. Users may prefer different trade-offs between task quality and deployment cost, sometimes also considering latency. Finding good assignments incurs a separate search cost from evaluating multiple candidates. We introduce Cost-Coupled Gittins (CC-Gittins), a multi-objective extension of single-objective cost-aware Gittins search for Pareto recommendation. It exploits the coupling between evaluation and deployment costs: assignments that cost more to deploy also cost more to evaluate. The search alternates between seeking higher quality and lower deployment cost, reusing each evaluation to inform both searches. After each batch, CC-Gittins recommends assignments that are nondominated under uncertainty-adjusted estimates of quality and deployment cost. We evaluate CC-Gittins on eight quality--cost matrices from workflows with two to five roles and up to 1,681 candidate assignments. We also evaluate the method with latency as a third objective. Across the eight benchmarks, CC-Gittins recovers a substantial fraction of the true Pareto frontier at roughly 10% of the exhaustive-evaluation cost, and recovers most of the frontier with few false positives by 30%.

参考リンク

リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。

実装を始めるプロンプト

参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。

# 論文・記事
Which Model for Which Role? Cost-Efficient Pareto Recommendation for LLM Agentic Workflows

# 概要
LLM agentic workflows increasingly employ different models for specialized roles. Users may prefer different trade-offs between task quality and deployment cost, sometimes also considering latency.

# 原典
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26676

上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。

関連する記事