Network Topology Shapes AI Intervention Effectiveness on Deception: Truth-Telling vs. Investigative Agents

概要

Deploying AI agents to combat dishonest communication is an intuitive response to deception in hybrid human-AI societies. However, the efficacy of such interventions in realistic networked settings remains unclear. We study this problem using an evolutionary game-theoretic model of the Deceiver's Game by extending it to structured networks, where agents can adopt deception, truth-telling, and investigation strategies. We introduce committed AI agents (zealots) fixed to either truth-telling or investigative strategies and conduct agent-based simulations across three network topologies. Our key findings are: (1) passive committed truth-telling agents can amplify adaptive deception by creating exploitable honest partners, whereas investigative agents increase adaptive truth-telling in the oscillatory regime; (2) intervention effects are non-monotonic in deployment density because committed agents reshape rather than simply suppress the underlying oscillatory dynamics; and (3) response peaks depend on topology, with sampled scale-free populations showing sharp low-density responses and fully connected populations requiring larger committed fractions. Overall, the results highlight the need to distinguish passive truth-telling from active investigation when using committed agents to influence networked deception dynamics.

参考リンク

• Paper ↗

リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。

実装を始めるプロンプト

参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。

# 論文・記事
Network Topology Shapes AI Intervention Effectiveness on Deception: Truth-Telling vs. Investigative Agents

# 概要
Deploying AI agents to combat dishonest communication is an intuitive response to deception in hybrid human-AI societies. However, the efficacy of such interventions in realistic networked settings…

# 原典
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.12931

上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。