math-theoryarxiv

Priority Coordination Games: Hodge Decomposition and a Sharp Design Limit

In decentralised priority coordination, agents announce priority levels and a shared resource serves them in decreasing order, as at an unsignalised intersection; the levels form the decision layer…

Zhihao Lin / Jianglin Lan / Anh-Tu Nguyen / Yoshinobu Kawahara

用途
原典で確認
難易度の目安
Hard
実装コストの目安
Medium

概要

In decentralised priority coordination, agents announce priority levels and a shared resource serves them in decreasing order, as at an unsignalised intersection; the levels form the decision layer of a hierarchical controller. Such interactions are routinely replaced by a potential game, i.e.\ by a common objective, for analysis and design. This paper determines what that surrogate misses, using the Hodge decomposition of the incentives into a potential component, which a common objective can represent, and a harmonic component, which it cannot. For the linear payoff, both components are obtained in closed form on every conflict graph and for every deterministic tie-breaking protocol: in common units, the harmonic energy is the number of conflicts and the potential energy adds the number of adjacent pairs of conflicts. Consequently, for every rationality parameter, the best common-objective model of the agents' choice log-odds, weighted uniformly over unilateral moves, has a relative squared error of at least $1/(d_{\max}+1)$, where $d_{\max}$ is the largest number of conflicts of one agent; for an eight-vehicle intersection it is exactly one fifth, for any number of priority levels. Invisible to strict-improvement dynamics, the missed component is, under low-rationality log-linear learning with uniform revision and to leading order, the stationary probability current, and its energy sets the entropy-production rate. Payoff design cannot remove it: on the complete conflict graph of $N$ agents, under a total-order protocol and with at least three priority levels, every nonconstant rank-based payoff leaves a relative error of at least $1/N$, with equality exactly for affine payoffs.

参考リンク

リンク先のライセンス・再現性・データ条件をご確認ください。自動分類や実装の目安は保証ではありません。

実装を始めるプロンプト

参考リンクを確認したうえで、次の内容をコピーして利用できます。

# 論文・記事
Priority Coordination Games: Hodge Decomposition and a Sharp Design Limit

# 概要
In decentralised priority coordination, agents announce priority levels and a shared resource serves them in decreasing order, as at an unsignalised intersection; the levels form the decision layer…

# 原典
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.05832

上記の手法を実装してください。実行前に依存関係とライセンスを確認してください。

関連する記事